Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editor's Pick

Trump’s Bid to Stall Hush Money Trial Thrown Out by N.Y. Appeals Judge

In a recent development in the ongoing legal saga involving the former President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, a New York appeals court judge has rejected Mr. Trump’s attempt to delay a trial regarding hush money payments. This marks a significant decision in the case that holds its roots in Trump’s presidential campaign period.

Justice Jennifer Schecter of the New York State Supreme Court’s Appellate Division denied Trump’s call for delay, thereby allowing the case to proceed without further hindrance. The lawsuit pertains to potential defamation against Summer Zervos, a onetime contestant on Mr. Trump’s reality TV show, “The Apprentice.” Ms. Zervos is one of the numerous women who have brought forth sexual misconduct allegations against Mr. Trump, which he has vehemently denied, leading to the defamation lawsuit.

The New York trial revolves around the allegations that Trump paid hush money to keep these misconduct claims from coming to public light during his 2016 presidential campaign. Two primary figures involved in the case include former Playboy model Karen McDougal and adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who have claimed they had affairs with Trump.

Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, argued that the trial should be delayed until the U.S. Supreme Court can decide whether Trump can be sued in state court. She contended that a sitting president cannot be sued in a state court due to federal supremacy. However, Justice Schecter dismissed the argument, stating that since Mr. Trump is no longer the President, the argument lost its hold and hence merits no basis for delay.

This decision is significant in the legal landscape, as it pushes forward a case against a former president for matters related to personal conduct— a development rather uncommon in the sphere of legal confrontations with U.S. presidents. This also ends the streak of legal victories Trump has been enjoying since leaving office.

The judge’s refusal to permit the delay effectively means the case will carry on as planned. It opens the door for pretrial depositions to collect further evidence. Consequently, Trump may potentially be ordered to testify under oath about the allegations against him and the hush money payments.

Such a development would cast a spotlight on the legal issues faced by Mr. Trump post his presidency. This ruling affects not only the former president but also the broader conversation surrounding accountability and consequences for public figures associated with serious allegations.

In conclusion, Justice Schecter’s decision stands as a pivotal milestone in ensuring that even individuals with

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Latest News, And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    Investing

    Getchell Gold Corp, a junior miner exploring gold mining in Nevada, has just initiated trading on the Frankfurt Exchange under the symbol GGA1. Getchell...

    Latest News

    France has announced the release of François Santoni, a French official that had been held by Niger security forces since July 7. The French...

    Stock

    With government issues, i.e. bonds, it is essential to consider the “long term trend” in order to get the most benefit and create wealth...

    Investing

    Exploration results from the latest Bigfoot Drilling Program at the Tatiggaq Project in Canada’s Thelon Basin, Yukon-Northwest Territories region have demonstrated that the uranium...

    Disclaimer: Incomeinvestingsinsider.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2023 Incomeinvestingsinsider.com