The Maryland political scene has been recently stirred with an array of impactful events, one of which stands out – the bold new Senate ad featuring Larry Hogan. In this extraordinary advertisement, Governor Hogan evokes the ‘horror’ of Jan. 6 and uses it as a centerpiece to articulate his political beliefs and future plans. This move has never been more poignant and has shaped the landscape of local politics in remarkable ways.
In the Senate ad, Hogan takes his audience on a journey, recollecting the dreadful incidents of the Capitol riot in Washington D.C. He pinpointedly reminds everyone of the day democracy was assaulted, emphasizing his fearless condemnation of the violent mob and his disappointment with any leader who did not disapprove of their actions or worse, supported them.
Hogan’s selection of Jan. 6 as a central theme is strategic and pertinent. In the aftermath of the insurrection, the Governor was a vocal critic of the rioters and their motivations. He unequivocally distanced himself from the rioters’ faction, making his stand bright and clear. Hogan’s reflections on the ‘horror’ is not just a personal recollection but a larger commentary on the standing of democracy in the country. His blunt and explicit use of the term ‘horror’ echoes his moral outrage and sense of responsibility as a political figure committed to democratic values.
By revisiting Jan. 6 in his Senate ad, Hogan strategically aligns himself with the legitimate concerns of the middle-class voter-base in Maryland. The degree of discontent and polarisation that has emerged in the local political arena post the Jan. 6 incident is undeniable. Hence, Hogan’s positioning of his leadership as a bulwark against such extremist incidents gives him an upper hand in connecting with the citizenry who were appalled by the attack on the Capitol.
Furthermore, the ad reflects Hogan’s sagacious ability to differentiate himself from the typical partisan politics that often leaves voters dissatisfied. He portrays himself as a leader ready to cross the political divide, adopting a more inclusive approach that seeks to unite rather than divide. This is not only a refreshing and unique stance in contemporary local politics but also speaks to Hogan’s confidence in his integrity as a public servant.
Interestingly, Hogan’s usage of Jan. 6 also serves as a subtle critique of those who have either been silent about the event or have failed to condemn it for what it was. By placing himself in contrast to such figures, Hogan manages to cement a moral high ground that
